Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:26:51 +0100 From: Udo Schweigert <udo.schweigert@siemens.com> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.cc>, Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/mutt Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20020129152651.GA39740@alaska.cert.siemens.de> In-Reply-To: <86vgdlb2td.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> References: <200201281806.g0SI6U989949@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020128181626.GA91155@malloc.eb.kliev.net> <20020128220136.GE49984@squall.waterspout.com> <20020129094005.GA11322@malloc.eb.kliev.net> <864rl5cwh5.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20020129134125.GB47169@madman.nectar.cc> <86vgdlb2td.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 00:21:34 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> At Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:41:25 -0600,
> Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:55:34PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> >> What about doing like this:
> >>
> >> master:
> >>
> >> PORTREVISION?= 0 # master port's revision
>>
>> Isn't this redundant (it is already in bsd.port.mk)?
>>
> >> slave:
> >>
> >> PORTREVISION= 1 # slave port's revision
> >>
> >> .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"
>
> Well, just to make sure I make my point clear; I simply explained how
> to give a master port and its slave ports different PORTREVISION
> values. The `?=' operator was the point.
>
That's way I understood it. My patch just submitted uses PORTREVISION?=3
Best regards
--
Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voice : +49 89 636 42170
CT IC 3, Siemens CERT | Fax : +49 89 636 41166
D-81730 Muenchen / Germany | email : udo.schweigert@siemens.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020129152651.GA39740>