Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:04:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251125] audio/jack: update to jack2 or add new port audio/jack2 Message-ID: <bug-251125-12827-1s18ueTK2a@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251125 Goran Mekić <meka@tilda.center> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meka@tilda.center --- Comment #3 from Goran Mekić <meka@tilda.center> --- Created attachment 219927 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=219927&action=edit jack.diff I just took https://github.com/DankBSD/ports/tree/lite/audio/jack and made a git patch out of it. It works incredibly more stable than jack1 on my laptop and my studio machine. It would be nice to have the patches upstreamed, but at this state where jack1 just fails to work with ardour6, I have no choice but to use this patch for myself. Can we properly upstream this patch? I mean, legaly, respecting author and other possible non-technical issues? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251125-12827-1s18ueTK2a>