Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:26:20 -0700 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packages with diablo dependencies Message-ID: <20040222082620.GA93094@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20040222081350.GA72227@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040222004847.GA57661@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040222062539.GA50119@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040222073554.GA71568@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040222073907.GA95266@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040222074600.GA71722@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040222081026.GA68300@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040222081350.GA72227@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:13:50AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:10:26AM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > > > > > Are there _any_ special environment variables that bento sets when its > > > > installing the packages for a build? All we need is something which > > > > the package install script and test for and say "Ok, this is bento". > > > > > > I mentioned above that bento now sets PACKAGE_BUILDING in the build > > > environment. > > > > My bad. But obviously this isn't passed to the package install script > > as it would exit before the licensing agreement if that environment setting > > was passed on. Maybe pkg_add runs the scripts with a different > > environment? > > When I ran this without the change in place it gave the previous > (different) behaviour of looping infinitely repeating the prompt, so > something is definitely different. Weird. This piece of the script is very simple. I'll do some more testing. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222082620.GA93094>