Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:07:15 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder Message-ID: <5144ED13.7020808@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOgwaMuBY0Prye3DZFYUck3%2BGZeiJOFcCeF3%2Bi=JBqO2FQWb3g@mail.gmail.com> References: <5144BEB7.3090906@tundraware.com> <CAOgwaMuBY0Prye3DZFYUck3%2BGZeiJOFcCeF3%2Bi=JBqO2FQWb3g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/16/2013 04:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > > > > With respect to your mount points : /usr1 is spanning TWO different partitions : > > /dev/ad4s1f 390G 127G 231G 35% /usr1 > /dev/ad6s1d 902G 710G 120G 86% /usr1/BKU > > > because /usr1/BKU is a sub-directory of /usr1 . > > > If you create a new directory , for example /usr2 , and /usr2/BKU , and using this new separate directory for sharing , such as : > > /dev/ad6s1d 902G 710G 120G 86% /usr2/BKU > > and > > machine:/usr2/BKU /BKU nfs rw,soft,intr 0 0 > > > will it make difference ? > > > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk I just tried this and it made no difference. The same file copied onto the NFS mount on /usr1/shared takes about 20x as long when coppied on to /usr[1|2]/BKU. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5144ED13.7020808>