Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:33:11 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d scripts can be missed if they aren't ordered with respect to the early-late divider Message-ID: <BANLkTi=iYGBC0QjiwhzJOR8LCjB0pztirg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DBB01D9.2060805@FreeBSD.org> References: <BANLkTi=FH4DeB-bH9Dcre_U-5J%2BP%2B3o_BA@mail.gmail.com> <4DBB01D9.2060805@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 04/29/2011 08:29, Ryan Stone wrote: >> Ultimately, the problem is that we don't have a total ordering over >> the rc.d scripts. > > You're right, but unfortunately it's not possible to do with the mandate of > supporting diskless boot, and /usr/local on a different (perhaps remote) > partition. Right, my phrasing was incorrect. What I really meant to say is that the problem is the current rc implementation implicitly assumes that we have a total ordering when we can't guarantee that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=iYGBC0QjiwhzJOR8LCjB0pztirg>