Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:33:15 +0200
From:      Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>
To:        "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp
Message-ID:  <7A4485B6-2300-4521-BAE7-04C9598FCC1A@ultra-secure.de>
In-Reply-To: <8A0622F0-D9FD-493B-8BDF-82D1359463F3@hub.org>
References:  <4F9A2AAE-938F-4FF5-A30C-72689D7F1F39@hub.org> <20130424093505.0f3e4415@suse3> <C643EE8D-5934-48EA-9305-EE6A07C5C897@hub.org> <C40EB001-4790-4BB9-A580-6D57D2CBC340@ultra-secure.de> <74CA0A5F-63EF-4B1B-B237-7A8DB76333A6@hub.org> <F9A66A1B-4C3A-4E7A-AF8C-88B3C93D33A1@ultra-secure.de> <8A0622F0-D9FD-493B-8BDF-82D1359463F3@hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Am 25.04.2013 um 00:26 schrieb "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>:

> 
> So, over 4x slower?
> 


That's a good question.



> Can you send me what your mount options are in /etc/fstab?  I'd like to try that out and compare against the two above … and I do have the Intel card on the way, so see if that makes a difference …  
> 

They look like this:

10.10.91.226:/the/export /usr/home/customer/bla/data/project_archives	nfs rw,bg,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 	0


But it also looks like your NetApp gives better default performance than the SmartOS'ed DL380 (for a price <fG>).
So, I'm not sure if it will make any difference.

Can you remove the disks and install CentOS6 on another pair of disks, just for kicks?



Rainer




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7A4485B6-2300-4521-BAE7-04C9598FCC1A>