Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:35:54 +0200 From: mxb <mxb@alumni.chalmers.se> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-STABLE and CARP states Message-ID: <B01BB972-3B67-4859-A96F-6CD2E14CEE97@alumni.chalmers.se> In-Reply-To: <4A818132-757F-4BAD-8137-CDB1F6F0681C@alumni.chalmers.se> References: <EDCF2D3E-D785-4DCA-8033-09D547BDCC93@alumni.chalmers.se> <4A818132-757F-4BAD-8137-CDB1F6F0681C@alumni.chalmers.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Moving this to freebsd-pf. On 31 mar 2014, at 22:21, mxb <mxb@alumni.chalmers.se> wrote: > > Manually setting net.inet.carp.demotion brought BOTH VHIDs in desired state. > pfsync bulk update seems to not put everything back as it should. > > lagg0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 9000 > options=8407bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWTSO> > ether 00:25:90:e3:71:f2 > inet 172.16.0.234 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 172.16.7.255 > inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fee3:71f2%lagg0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > inet 172.16.0.231 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 172.16.7.255 vhid 201 > inet 172.16.0.233 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 172.16.7.255 vhid 202 > nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: active > carp: MASTER vhid 201 advbase 1 advskew 1 > carp: BACKUP vhid 202 advbase 5 advskew 100 > laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4 > laggport: ix1 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> > laggport: ix0 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> > > > On 31 mar 2014, at 20:42, mxb <mxb@alumni.chalmers.se> wrote: > >> >> Hi list, >> >> hopefully this is the right place to have my question regarding CARP on 10-STABLE. >> >> I have two nodes with following setup(node1): >> >> lagg0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 9000 >> options=8407bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWTSO> >> ether 00:25:90:e3:71:f2 >> inet 172.16.0.234 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 172.16.7.255 >> inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fee3:71f2%lagg0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >> inet 172.16.0.231 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 172.16.7.255 vhid 201 >> inet 172.16.0.233 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 172.16.7.255 vhid 202 >> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> >> media: Ethernet autoselect >> status: active >> carp: BACKUP vhid 201 advbase 1 advskew 1 >> carp: BACKUP vhid 202 advbase 5 advskew 100 >> laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4 >> laggport: ix1 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> >> laggport: ix0 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> >> >> net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on both nodes. as well as PSYNC as this: >> >> pfsync0: flags=41<UP,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500 >> pfsync: syncdev: vlan22 syncpeer: 10.22.22.2 maxupd: 128 defer: off >> >> The problem is (if it is not clear from the ifconfig-output for the lagg0) the state of VHID 201. >> Node2 with advskew of 100 is currently MASTER, but it SHOULD NOT as of setup. >> >> Am I hitting a bug or doing something wrong? >> >> I also have noted that after the pfsync bulk update the demotion counter never setts to 0, but stays on 480, >> thus preventing node1 become a MASTER 201(?). Or is this a normal behavior? >> >> Regards, >> mxb >> >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B01BB972-3B67-4859-A96F-6CD2E14CEE97>