Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:05:55 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> Cc: John <comp.john@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple zfs query Message-ID: <4BAB2773.5060503@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <d36406631003241423x4fade0dfra3f45f2f4784648c@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100324103151.GA2598@potato> <4BA9F87E.7050205@infracaninophile.co.uk> <d36406631003241423x4fade0dfra3f45f2f4784648c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 24/03/2010 21:23:54, krad wrote:
> If you want 100% of the drives you could have a pool per drive. Its not as
> nice as one big pool, but its less risky than one big raid0
Errr... no it's not. The risk of something going wrong is exactly the
same. The only advantage is that you may have less data to restore when
things do go wrong.
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkurJ3MACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyjLwCfdkpLP2MvtWPWBOE4Db/bJRNR
tBkAnRA2ZcoGN/LwGaoY9gfkNkdOq6kE
=O87f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BAB2773.5060503>