Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:20:25 GMT From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/78021: sem_open(3) doesn't mention fnctl.h include requirement Message-ID: <200502242220.j1OMKPCV019525@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/78021; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/78021: sem_open(3) doesn't mention fnctl.h include requirement Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:19:08 +0200 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:04:47PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: >=20 > sem_open(3) identifies semaphore.h as an include requirement for sem_open= (); > however, sem_open()'s oflag argument can take on values of O_CREAT or O_E= XCL, > which are defined in fcntl.h. >=20 > ... >=20 > The fix is either to document the include dependency, or remove it, perha= ps > via a nested include. I don't know which is the right one from a standar= ds > perspective. >=20 POSIX says: """ Inclusion of the <semaphore.h> header may make visible symbols defined in t= he headers <fcntl.h> and <sys/types.h>. """ Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCHlLcqRfpzJluFF4RArAUAJ0Tpv2HWMmn9C1KcRMlVfIm5iNe2gCggOy/ OzaEelQRjNPaH3UMpMqqmow= =MQCk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502242220.j1OMKPCV019525>