Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:51:22 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel build problem Message-ID: <20001027055122.A13500@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200010271146.WAA19627@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au>; from darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au on Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:46:24PM %2B1100 References: <20001027042428.A11977@dragon.nuxi.com> <200010271146.WAA19627@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:46:24PM +1100, Darren Reed wrote: > I'm generally compiling/developing on -STABLE (in this case, the > imported code was compiling cleanly on 4.1-RELEASE) and generally don't > think that it'll be _that_ different. In all seriousness, the farther down the 4.x branch we get, the divergence between -STABLE and -CURRENT gets *quite* different. This is unfortunate, but until we do major paid release engineering, many things are MFC'ed that really could/should be to reduce the differences. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001027055122.A13500>