Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:33:51 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... Message-ID: <224383192.20050217213351@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050217123730.O79252@makeworld.com> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr> <2810734464.20050217192707@wanadoo.fr> <20050217123730.O79252@makeworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RacerX writes: > Then show us your proof - I do. I have a section on my site dedicated to > FBSD as a desktop using various versions from 2.2.1 on up to 5.3-RC How do you prove that FreeBSD is suitable as a replacement for Windows? -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?224383192.20050217213351>