Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:41:41 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum performance Message-ID: <20030330231141.GD1861@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpbrzthqpy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030330125138.K23911@leelou.in.tern> <xzpk7ehhxaf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030330081831.5c4e317e.fearow@attbi.com> <xzpbrzthqpy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sunday, 30 March 2003 at 16:30:17 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > Anti <fearow@attbi.com> writes: >> try benchmarking ccd as well to see how it compares? and try some big stripe >> sizes (4093, 8191, 12281)? > > I believe Greg showed in his USENIX paper on Vinum that large stripe > sizes aren't preferable to small ones. I may misremember though. You misremember. I said that large stripe sizes *are* preferable. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+h3mtIubykFB6QiMRAuAcAKCxNw2qdmGuN7zqKybfglwmYq6NvgCglNaf Smw01PEfsbjAqfLFqWRfnYM= =kNAN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030330231141.GD1861>
