Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:02:13 -0700
From:      Jeff Behl <jbehl@fastclick.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: serial/ether console & ramblings
Message-ID:  <426DD965.4010106@fastclick.com>
In-Reply-To: <426D5F94.1000302@elischer.org>
References:  <E1DQ8ns-000JXj-Is@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <426D4179.1020508@fastclick.com> <426D59F5.4070601@elischer.org> <426D5C93.4020802@fastclick.com> <426D5F94.1000302@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:

>
>
> Jeff Behl wrote:
>
>>>> but my whole point is that nothing in 1) works remotely (out of band)
>>>> when the system and the BMC share the same ethernet controller, at 
>>>> least
>>>> with the bge driver.  as i mentioned in the thread, i can power cycle
>>>> and see the serial console remotely (number 2 from above) all the 
>>>> way up
>>>> to the point where the kernel loads.  as soon as it does, the bge 
>>>> driver
>>>> no longer shunts off RMCP packets (what IPMI uses) to the Baseboard
>>>> Management Controller, so no IPMI...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>
>>> the intel MBs allow you to share the 10/100 ethernet with the IPMI
>>> controller.
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>> as do the motherboards with the e325s.  we can to everything out of band
>> when running linux, but that's because the driver for the broadcom nics
>> in linux are aware of the BMC...
>>  
>>
>
> I run the intels with FreeBSD OOB without any problems.


what interface driver is being used?

that'd be nifty if the motherboard had first dibs on a packet, but i 
didn't realize that was the way it could work.  the linux bge driver 
certainly has code in it specifically for RMCP packets...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426DD965.4010106>