Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:45:38 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901091143200.328-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <17480.915909238@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >If having sysctl descriptions in the kernel really is a problem for > >some people, it's trivial to add a kernel option to disable my code. > > It is, just ask small@freebsd.org what adding a lot of text to the > kernel will do. Yes, but couldn't these things be ignored easily with an ifdef (a.k.a. option)? This way the pedants would get their small kernel, and the rest of us could have English descriptions.. - alex | "Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern | | technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat." | | Powered by FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901091143200.328-100000>