Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:11:20 GMT From: Klavs Klavsen <klavs@EnableIT.dk> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/116115: Bug in portaudit: it does not handle packagenames with , Message-ID: <200709051011.l85ABKax081647@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200709051020.l85AK15L059369@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 116115 >Category: misc >Synopsis: Bug in portaudit: it does not handle packagenames with , >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Sep 05 10:20:01 GMT 2007 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Klavs Klavsen >Release: FreeBSD-6.2 >Organization: EnableIT >Environment: FreeBSD tomcat5-ny.telmore.dk 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 11:05:30 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 >Description: Hi guys, I was just testing portaudit on FreeBSD 6.2. I have mod_jk-1.2.19,1 installed. a portaudit -Fda does not show it's vulnerable to anything. However - it really is, and it's in the vulndb as well. If I rename mod_jk-1.2.19,1 to mod_jk-1.2.19 a portaudit -Fda (or just -a) says it's vulnerable. So the conclusion is that portaudit's "version number" matching doesn't seem to handle ,'s all that well. >How-To-Repeat: rename mod_jk to mod_jk-1.2.19,1 and see it NOT work. >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200709051011.l85ABKax081647>