Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:11:47 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas ideas.xml Message-ID: <20090312131147.18623am36o8ct24g@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903121128320.61873@fledge.watson.org> References: <200903120659.n2C6xas2031642@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090312113812.179151uxuziye0w0@webmail.leidinger.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903121128320.61873@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> (from Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:32:31 +0000 (GMT)): > I think there could be a useful project to be done on fleshing out > kernel SDT providers, but that we need to come up with a more > specific description if we want it to be useful for GSoC. We also > need to identify a potential mentor for the project who can field > questions during the proposal process, potentially mentor the > project, and so on. To have it on the ideas list we don't need a GSoC mentor... basically I say that I think that the DTraceToolkit stuff should stay on the ideas list in some form (doesn't matter to me if it is marked up fro the GSoC or not). That aside, as I already added a lot of dtrace probes in my linuxulator user branch (slowed down a little bit ATM because of other high priority tasks), I feel confident to mentor some DTrace probes related GSoC project (if there's some interest out there that this should be done), so the mentor part should not be a showstopper. Bye, Alexander. -- If it sits on your desk for 15 minutes, you've just become the expert. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090312131147.18623am36o8ct24g>