Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:21:21 -0500 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe this is a bug, should I report it? Message-ID: <20071205092121.1c8dcaac.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20071205013053.I89093@prime.gushi.org> References: <20071205013053.I89093@prime.gushi.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>: > But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2, when > gpg is still in the tree? > > I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2 > installed. Show us the output that demonstrates this problem. My first guess is that it's not portupgrade that's doing it, but that some port you're upgrading now lists gpg2 as a dependency instead of gpg, which causes the attempted installation. But I'm just speculating without more details. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071205092121.1c8dcaac.wmoran>