Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:17:35 +0800 From: Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com> To: Xiaoye Sun <Xiaoye.Sun@rice.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: High priority for the tx queue in netmap Message-ID: <CAMOc5czNQvbftNO6T2trh5cSukuN5QdoUxKxNtamvcEHThfUAA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJnByzjzM8J9PP0NAOGOvmHZjm87LbFd2%2B%2BLdBWnpgfHXU7bLQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJnByzg2PspHhvFyDWpYfXZWNGTmmAJ992jMa=FPwAfM-LEiJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMOc5cxapOdEv1dX8t-3r-UJ7UoCTrfjArQ7YV0D03iefNEEMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJnByzjzM8J9PP0NAOGOvmHZjm87LbFd2%2B%2BLdBWnpgfHXU7bLQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Xiaoye Sun <Xiaoye.Sun@rice.edu> wrote: > I'm using the typical intel 10 Gbps nic. > Does ethtool have related configuration command? You can check Intel's spec on their website for the chip you use. They have very good documentation. IIRC, the default behavior is to round-robin TX queue on packet boundary (after TSO segementation). Don't know about Linux driver's state, but you have the detailed document, you can always change the code as you like for your own stuffs. Thanks, sephe -- Tomorrow Will Never Die
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMOc5czNQvbftNO6T2trh5cSukuN5QdoUxKxNtamvcEHThfUAA>