Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:39:17 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away Message-ID: <199908212139.OAA01386@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 01:01:35 MDT." <199908210701.BAA41654@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199908190737.AAA04137@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: > : Seriously though, I'm in the process of replacing a number of the > : ad-hoc event handler callout lists in the kernel (most notably the > : at_shutdown and apm* lists) with a generic implementation. > > Shouldn't the apm stuff use the new-bus hooks? I've migraded a couple > of uses in pccard to using that now that I have newbus node to hang > them off of... Certainly anything that's attached to a bus should be using the bus' suspend event handler, yes. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908212139.OAA01386>