Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:34:32 +0200
From:      Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com>
To:        "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org>
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Assuming We Want FreeBSD to Grow: Who Is It For?
Message-ID:  <dcb2c27a050217123424ed0d84@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200502171233.j1HCXMRI036090@fire.jhs.private>
References:  <thomas.leveille@gmail.com> <a83b4fdf05021702151ae8b384@mail.gmail.com> <200502171233.j1HCXMRI036090@fire.jhs.private>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:22 +0100, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.org> wrote:
> 
> Much hot air on advocacy@ does not qualify.  Let's
>         - Tell people to move to chat@freebsd.org.
>         - Report offenders to postmaster@freebsd.org for blocking.
>         - Request postmaster@freebsd.org appends to list definition:
>             "Not for arguing about what FreeBSD is or where it should go."
>           (developers on current@ etc, are unpaid, & advocacy@ people
>           have no right to direct what FreeBSD is & will be.)

I think its hould be slightly more openly worded - for example,
discussions (i mean rational discussions with technical details) of
what FreeBSD is may be in some warranted - consider for example
producing materials to promote the use of FreeBSD in embedded systems
or similar.

> 
> -
> Julian Stacey        Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich       http://berklix.com
> Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam).  Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dcb2c27a050217123424ed0d84>