Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:30:12 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@geekpunk.net> Cc: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raidframe Message-ID: <20020610173012.A87145@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020529141424.E38505-100000@leto.homeportal.2wire.net>; from bandix@geekpunk.net on Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:18:40PM -0500 References: <20020529205841.A54965@energyhq.homeip.net> <20020529141424.E38505-100000@leto.homeportal.2wire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:18:40PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > If you really want to play with RAIDframe I'd guess you'll have a much > easier time of it under NetBSD, where it is included with the operating > system. Getting it working under FreeBSD could be a lot of fun and you > might learn a lot, but I don't see it being a terribly useful exercise > otherwise. I get the impression that most of us are quite happy with > vinum and would not desire that FreeBSD bloat the kernel by including > two software RAID frameworks. Then again, I speak for noone by myself. You quite speak for yourself. I've seen the FreeBSD community more split 50%-50% in their love-hate of Vinum. Many of us still use ccd(4) because Vinum did not meet our needs. Scott Long had just about ported RAIDframe to FreeBSD, when the bits got lost in a disk crash. So the rumor goes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020610173012.A87145>