Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:05:56 -0600 From: Alan Amesbury <amesbury@umn.edu> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCD-MIB for bsnmpd? Message-ID: <479F5CF4.4020000@umn.edu> In-Reply-To: <478FBC91.1060606@umn.edu> References: <478FBC91.1060606@umn.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alan Amesbury wrote: [snip] > I'd like to run bsnmpd, but need the UCD-MIB for other performance > monitoring. I could run net-snmp and proxy requests through it to > bsnmpd, but that strikes me as inelegant. There's a bsnmpd-ucd module > at Google > > http://bsnmp-ucd.googlecode.com/ > > > which is seems to work, except for some minor bugs in what it reports > for laLoadFloat.[123]. Have any of you experience with this? Are there > plans to add it to the ports tree? [snip] Since no one else responded to this thread, I'm assuming I'm the only one using this feature... at least on *this* list. :-) For what it's worth, v0.1.3 appears to work as expected. I've been able to narrow down some performance problems on one of my systems. (It appears to be dropping packets when traffic exceeds ~120Kpkts/sec, vs. its near twin which seems fine at ~190Kpkts/sec). It'd still be nice to get bsnmp-ucd into the stock ports tree, though, as I think other people might eventually benefit from it. Should that request be done through a PR? As always, thanks in advance! -- Alan Amesbury University of Minnesota
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?479F5CF4.4020000>