Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:47:52 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will ZFS become stable? Message-ID: <flr0np$euj$2@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org> References: <fll63b$j1c$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4083928B2011A1784CF8EBD9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Watson wrote: > I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet in the thread, but anothe= r=20 > thing worth taking into account in considering the stability of ZFS is = > whether or not Sun considers it a production feature in Solaris. Last = I=20 > heard, it was still considered an experimental feature there as well. Last I heard, rsync didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :) --------------enig4083928B2011A1784CF8EBD9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHgQY4ldnAQVacBcgRAgPaAJ9VdX3dBVBaTUe6sHPZp8BC7fGUrwCfQTy7 aQdjHiLPe1K5WOwdh67nJ4I= =Z7cc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4083928B2011A1784CF8EBD9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?flr0np$euj$2>