Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:21:48 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: [jakub@redhat.com:Linking against libpthread via -pthread? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0602110118310.9242-100000@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20060210191637.374daa37@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > No. The change to link in libc by default and libpthread with -pthread > are inthe works and will be committed shortly. There is not way around > this if we want working versioned libc and libpthread in our system. Why is that? We really don't want -pthread to build in libpthread dependency when linking shared libraries. So are you working on building a symbol list/map for libc? I was doing this myself, but I don't want to spend time duplicating effort. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0602110118310.9242-100000>