Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:17:46 +0000 From: Tim Larson <Tim.Larson@proxibid.com> To: "users@dragonflybsd.org" <users@dragonflybsd.org>, "netbsd-users@netbsd.org" <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>, "freebsd-chat@freebsd.org" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>, "misc@openbsd.org" <misc@openbsd.org> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robin__Bj=F6rklin?= <robin.bjorklin@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Unified BSD? Message-ID: <AEBD551BDF24D2419B88DF118B63C77E3B08B8@Pollux.proxibid.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOc%2B9seWtWaw=bx%2BKwjKXjULArijgcvbDR1gi_J%2BSQkFfsHTCA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOc%2B9seWtWaw=bx%2BKwjKXjULArijgcvbDR1gi_J%2BSQkFfsHTCA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I know the basic history of all the BSDs and the reasons for divergence, bu= t I've always tended to think of them as different focus areas of a single = project. The best ideas tend to get shared around, where applicable, but ea= ch retains its unique focus and niche within the greater whole. We don't ne= ed a "unified" BSD; BSD is already unified in the ways that matter. Open so= urce and meritocracy see to that. Tim -- Tim Larson Software Engineer [Proxibid]<http://www.proxibid.com/>; e: Tim.Larson@proxibid.com p: 877-505-7770 d: 402-505-7770 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended = solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. = If you have received this email in error please notify by return email. If = you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copyin= g, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this in= formation is strictly prohibited. Warning: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no= viruses are present in this email, no assurance or warranty is given that = this email and any attachments are free of viruses.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AEBD551BDF24D2419B88DF118B63C77E3B08B8>