Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:07:04 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> To: delphij@delphij.net Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: gcc 3.x & fbsd 4.9? Message-ID: <67870000.1074953224@palle.girgensohn.se> In-Reply-To: <20040124140425.7479611456@beastie.frontfree.net> References: <20040124140425.7479611456@beastie.frontfree.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On l=F6rdag, januari 24, 2004 22.04.31 +0800 Xin LI = <delphij@frontfree.net>=20 wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Palle Girgensohn >> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 9:51 PM >> To: gerald@FreeBSD.org >> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org >> Subject: gcc 3.x & fbsd 4.9? >> >> version name. Perhaps this is alright, 3.3.3-"current" is >> perhaps more stable than 3.3.2-release? > > I believe so. The 3.3.3-"CURRENT" has fixed a number of serious bugs, > especially, optimizer bugs in 3.3.2, and the snapshot chosen for the port > should be much more stable than 3.3.2-RELEASE. I think that's the reason > why there's no gcc 3.3.2 port. AFAIK, gcc 3.4.0 is planned to be released > in the near future, and 3.3.x is somewhat "STABLE" branch in gcc's > notation. Cool, that's what I expected. Thanks for the input! /Palle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?67870000.1074953224>