Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:04:03 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compiler warnings (was: Re: [rfc] a few kern.mk and bsd.sys.mk related changes) Message-ID: <BANLkTinoFqcXQAnQX-AT%2BJugxwFndk4KfA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110530174423.95220@gmx.com> References: <20110530174423.95220@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 May 2011 18:44, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> wrote: >> maybe we find some nice -Wwarning options which are reasonable >> to have > > -Wmissing-declarations > -Wimplicit > > FreeBSD's gcc doesn't seem to have =A0-Wcoercion =A0??? > Bugzilla indicates that it was added years ago (2006?). > > It would be really really nice if -static worked on (nearly) everything. > >> and - most importantly - don't break tinderbox > > That's a matter of fixing the bugs before adding the warning flags > to tinderbox. > > Ports need attention. =A0The warnings I get there are frightening. I find it comforting that they're just that: warnings. How do they frighten you? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTinoFqcXQAnQX-AT%2BJugxwFndk4KfA>