Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:40:35 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: kiril@ideaglobal.com (Kiril Mitev) Cc: didier@omnix.net, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, cracauer@cons.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Message-ID: <200003302240.PAA20522@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200003301625.QAA76045@loki.ideaglobal.com> from Kiril Mitev at "Mar 30, 0 04:25:18 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Kiril Mitev wrote: > > As I recall, Didier Derny wrote: > > > I can't an many people can't upgrade the system on their machine > > > at the actual rythm of FreeBSD version (each one supposed to be the best > > > one and solve most of the problems :-))) ) > > > without a real stability (like the one with 2.x) this product > > > has no more value than linux or solaris, sco... > > > > So, is there some feature in the 3.x line that isn't in 2.2.x that > > you can't live without? If not, your course is clear. Put up a > > 2.2-STABLE system and quit worrying about stability. > > *ahem* > > In other words "do not use anything newer than 2.2 if you > worry about stability"... > > In other words "nothing in FreeBSD has improved stability > since 2.2" Well, not an exact quote. Didier refered to the "real stability" of 2.2, so I suggested if he felt that way, he should run it. > In other words "2.2 is our most stable version" > (ever?) Might have been... -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003302240.PAA20522>