Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:38:40 -0800 From: Kevin Baxter <voidchicken@gmail.com> To: Manolis Kiagias <sonic2000gr@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/163102: linprocfs mounted in wrong location in Handbook Message-ID: <4EDFB2B0.8040901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EDFAFCD.7050508@gmail.com> References: <201112071720.pB7HKA7W019067@freefall.freebsd.org> <4EDFAFCD.7050508@gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 12/07/2011 10:26, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > On 7/12/2011 7:20 ìì, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: >> The following reply was made to PR docs/163102; it has been noted by >> GNATS. >> >> From: Patrick Lamaiziere<patfbsd@davenulle.org> >> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org<bug-followup@freebsd.org> >> Cc: Kevin Baxter<voidchicken@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: docs/163102: linprocfs mounted in wrong location in >> Handbook >> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:02:34 +0100 >> >> Le Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:30:15 GMT, >> Kevin Baxter<voidchicken@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> > $ ls /usr/compat >> > ls: /usr/compat: No such file or directory >> > $ ls -ld /compat >> > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jan 17 2010 compat >> > >> > It isn't a symlink on my system. At what point in installation is it >> > supposed to have been created? I don't see a mention of that >> > anywhere in the Handbook. Chapter 11.2 even refers to /compat/linux >> > instead of /usr/compat/linux. >> >> On 9.0 bsdinstall does not create the /compat symlink. Or >> even /compat, it is created when you install the linux base. >> You have to move /compat to /usr/compat and create the link by hand. > > I've checked on 9.0-RC2 and the link is there, but my installs were > upgraded from 8.2-RELEASE, so you may have a point there. I'll check > on a clean 9.0-RC3 install shortly and report findings. > >> >> This is a bug in bsdinstall imho. Sysintall did it. I don't know if >> this is fixed (I've installed with a 9.0 beta usb key) >> >> Regards. > > If it happens that 9.0 installs into /compat, we should either add > this to the documentation or file a PR so that either the linux_base > package or bsdinstall creates the link. > But from the current PR it seems the OP was using 8.2-RELEASE which > should not exhibit this. I'm using a ZFS root, so I used the wiki's RootOnZFS page to install (which doesn't use sysinstall, and doesn't mention /compat). So is this a case of a non-standard installation being unsupported? Should the wiki be changed to include that symlink? Or should one of the install scripts be changed to make the symlink?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EDFB2B0.8040901>