Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:01:55 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@regency.nsu.ru> To: Jan Stocker <Jan.Stocker@t-online.de> Cc: Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com>, Mark Pulford <markp@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games Makefile ports/games/lbreakout2 Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-install pkg-plist Message-ID: <20020814170155.A20454@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <1029314847.361.0.camel@twoflower>; from Jan.Stocker@t-online.de on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:47:26AM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0208120952260.31613-100000@pebkac.owp.csus.edu> <1029314847.361.0.camel@twoflower>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:47:26AM +0200, Jan Stocker wrote: > This is not quite right.... > > why commiting a newer pr and stealing -M-Y- port????? I had *exactly* the same problem once. Committer said he was looking through non-critical section of PRs, while I noted my PR `serious'. Thus, he noticed my PR (submitted long, long before the latter) only afterwards. I think the problem is that "severity level" for ports PR is useless and causes more confusion than any good. Something gotta be done about this. Otherwise, ports "steals" will very likely happen again and again. ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020814170155.A20454>