Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 00:42:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Laszlo Danielisz <laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: daap and pf Message-ID: <1382859771.17026.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I run a Firefly server on my FreeBSD machine.
In case I disable pf everything works fine. As I enable it I can not connect/I can't see the server in iTunes, even if I put the following line into pf.conf
pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from 192.168.1.0/24 to ($ext_if) port 1:65000
Do you any idea what should I check?
Laci
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 09:01:18 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0093133F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:01:17 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net)
Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (mtumishi.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.201])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28C42E80
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:01:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130])
by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04A917A85;
Sun, 27 Oct 2013 04:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <526CD432.5090306@cyberleo.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 03:52:02 -0500
From: CyberLeo Kitsana <cyberleo@cyberleo.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130908 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com>
Subject: Re: (de)centralized ports management with portsnap
References: <526AC748.6010805@networktest.com>
In-Reply-To: <526AC748.6010805@networktest.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:01:18 -0000
On 10/25/2013 02:32 PM, David Newman wrote:
> I'm setting up a group of FreeBSD servers that use 'portsnap fetch' and
> then 'portsnap update' to refresh their ports trees.
>
> Can I set up a local master to avoid pulling updates multiple times? If
> portsnap isn't the right tool for this, what is?
>
> Apologies if this has been asked before; this seems like a standard
> problem, but I didn't see an answer in a web search, the portsnap
> manpage, or in the Michael W. Lucas FreeBSD book.
ports/171681
I do the same; additionally, I maintain some private ports that are not
very useful outside of my organization. The patch in ports/171681 allows
me to use 'make update' in /usr/ports to synchronize via rsync from a
central server.
Recently, I have been using poudriere and portmaster for semi-embedded
and jail installs that have common software needs, which eliminates the
need for a local ports tree entirely.
--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net
<CyberLeo@CyberLeo.Net>
Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1382859771.17026.YahooMailNeo>