Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:32:06 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The PR db is not for -current problems, right? Message-ID: <20010618123205.I728@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010616180104.A19537@schweikhardt.net>; from schweikh@schweikhardt.net on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 06:01:04PM %2B0200 References: <20010616180104.A19537@schweikhardt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YPJ8CVbwFUtL7OFW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 06:01:04PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: >=20 > Hello fellow PR drivers, >=20 > just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs > against problems on -current: my understanding is that folks running > -current know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the > bleeding edge and that they must be subscribed to current@ where they > shall discuss -current-related malfunctions. Right? If so, do you think > it's a good idea to make this more explicit in the handbook? I disagree - it's important that people are able to raise problems against -current; how else does someone report a bug against a driver, for instance, that is in current, but not in stable. The PR system isn't just for -stable. Joe --YPJ8CVbwFUtL7OFW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjst5rUACgkQXVIcjOaxUBY6EwCgqNw+SDjZG3sFYs1uIYLQCWCQ 3nMAnRY9STiiLBPWA34aBocRcrHVXbai =ubfO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YPJ8CVbwFUtL7OFW-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618123205.I728>