Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:29:15 +0800 From: Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> To: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror of Raidz for data reliability Message-ID: <CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BdUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOfEmZh8v5xbQqkJJ7ZKkan7Ho0FPNrXJ95S1WRpioDXVG6P7w@mail.gmail.com> <20120515102206.GA53750@psconsult.nl> <CAOfEmZiTkr9Xcj6J4FRBd4FzL1ztgEpytSAUc=wZ8DBJtXsH%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BdUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
George, > If you have 2 machines then your best bet would be HAST. > So, why use ETHERNET if my Machine can see both JBOD? > If you are worried about data replication you can always use lagg with > 2 or more interfaces. It is different than data replication. It is data protection. Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g>