Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:21:39 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DTrace/FreeBSD source snapshot Message-ID: <20080202232139.GA97956@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <20080202230728.GA8594@voi.aagh.net> References: <20080201093538.GA83169@what-creek.com> <18339.35979.765504.132672@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20080201223719.GA88460@what-creek.com> <18340.50354.244903.435464@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20080202203319.GA96610@what-creek.com> <20080202230728.GA8594@voi.aagh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 11:07:28PM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > Are there no anonymous checkouts from perforce? Anonymous access to perforce isn't possible because perforce maintains client state on the server. That's one of the disadvantages of perforce. > I remember looking a while ago and not finding anything. I also > remember a cvsup server linked to it at some point.. There was, but some hardware problems got in the way of the export and the files weren't kept up-to-date. Since I am so close to committing to current, it isn't worth wasting the project admins' time getting it back up an running when it will be obsolete soon. I decide that I could distribute one big tar and then diffs from that, so although the initial download is huge, keeping the source tree up-to-date should be just a matter of applying a patch or two (or twenty). -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080202232139.GA97956>