Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:59:31 +0400 From: Spartak Radchenko <spartak@aif.ru> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why? Message-ID: <20040810215931.GA41092@oberon.aif.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org> <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru> <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:44:14PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >>I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are > >>running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th > >>performs atrociously: > >> > >>neptune# netstat -ni | head > >>Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs > >>Coll > >>em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1 > >>10858513 > > > >I have no problems with em: > > > >>netstat -ni | head > >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs > >Coll > >em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 0 > >0 > > > >>uname -rs > >FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3 > > Against what type of switch? I don't know :) It's a server on colocation. All I can say - it must be a managed switch because I was told to configure NIC to use 100Mbps full-duplex. However, I have another server with em NIC. This server works with Alcatel OmniStack 6024 (autodetect enabled): Network interface status: Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll em0* 1500 <Link#1> 00:0e:0c:09:df:e6 0 0 0 0 0 em1 1500 <Link#2> 00:0e:0c:09:df:e7 30962103 0 39054512 0 0 -- Spartak Radchenko SVR1-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040810215931.GA41092>