Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:51:54 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav?= Haisman <V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, delphij@delphij.net, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, mag@intron.ac Subject: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++ Message-ID: <86sll8zl9x.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <44B2D2DF.2000401@sh.cvut.cz> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav?= Haisman's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:21:19 %2B0200") References: <200607092136.k69LaNDX055391@www.freebsd.org> <84dead720607092015q7f1701abse143f3855c2aa95a@mail.gmail.com> <1152540567.99616@origin.intron.ac> <44B2AE69.4080703@elischer.org> <44B2D2DF.2000401@sh.cvut.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
V=E1clav Haisman <V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz> writes: > Deciding that some features are bad beforehand, before you evaluate > them is IMO bad idea. Let interested people write a bunch of C++ > modules with the complete language before deciding on what shouldn't > be used. It's not that simple. The complete language requires a ton of support code which must be written and tested. Are you volunteering to do that? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sll8zl9x.fsf>