Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:23:03 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Takeo Hashimoto <takeo@ss.jip.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, hashimototakeo@mac.com Subject: Re: advocacy/89731: TOO MANY SPAMs on jp.freebsd.org's mailing list Message-ID: <200512020823.05064.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <051202121018.M0201229@emifuku.ss.jip.co.jp> References: <051202121018.M0201229@emifuku.ss.jip.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 01 December 2005 10:10 pm, Takeo Hashimoto wrote: > > What > > do you really want the project to do? > > I had misunderstood that send-pr will reach to jp admins, > but now I know send-pr system is not directly connected to jp admins. > > so... If there is someone in the project who can contact to jp admins, > and if he can, would he please forward this topic to them? > That is the only thing that I can want the project to do. Ok, that sounds reasonable. I can point one of the guys on core@ at this P= R=20 actually since he is in .jp and I think he might work with jp.freebsd.org. > > All we can really do is point the jp.freebsd.org > > domain at a different set of folks, but we can't do that unless a > > different set of folks with machines exist and are setup and have > > demonstrated that they are more responsive than the existing jp folks. > > waoh waoh it is the last choise that I don't want. > I am not a terrorist, I want to make better changes (or no changes) > peacefully. I understand. I'm mostly just trying to make a point about what the projec= t=20 can or can not do. I guess the biggest thing is that freebsd.org and=20 jp.freebsd.org aren't very tightly joined, but fairly independent of each=20 other. > >> OK, then, this PR was wrong topic. > >> my last task of this PR is only one thing: > >> - post a summary > >> > >> ...am I wrong again? :) > > > >You can post a summary if you wish. I'll probably close the PR after th= at > >though. > > Thanks. I am now preparing it, please wait more few hours. Sure. > >> anyway, I will keep act to jp admins. thanks. > > > >Ok, that's the best thing to do for now. If the jp folks are not > > responsive you can send an e-mail to core@, but note that from the notes > > above there really isn't a whole lot core can do other than perhaps pull > > jp.freebsd.org but that would only be viable if the current jp was worse > > than having no jp at all, which I highly doubt would be true. > > I hope that I do not send claim to core@. > We still need jp subdomain, I just want to make it better. Yes, I wouldn't expect you need to resort to e-mailing core@. Due to the w= ay=20 the projects are organized however, as far as freebsd.org itself, e-mailing= =20 core@ is about all you can really do. Anything less drastic requires=20 interacting with jp.freebsd.org directly, but I think we're both clear on=20 that now. =2D-=20 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> =A0<>< =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =A0=3D =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512020823.05064.jhb>