Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:50:00 -0700 From: Pamela Ballantyne <boyvalue@gmail.com> To: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au> Cc: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" <mirror176@hotmail.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Illumos ZFS, and OpenZFS Message-ID: <CAESeg0xkQuMPefcyRMw2QhxVz9WE8jveRvt-puvrcSm8qXAdKw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <044f7ecb-e9dc-4fb9-b277-dde4eb257efd@heuristicsystems.com.au> References: <4ff00fb1-6f7b-476e-8eb5-7d5db8262a23@holgerdanske.com> <CO1PR11MB4770E560CCC9A016F88967A8E6502@CO1PR11MB4770.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <044f7ecb-e9dc-4fb9-b277-dde4eb257efd@heuristicsystems.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:02 PM Dewayne Geraghty < dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote: > > >> My avoidance of OpenZFS has been reaffirmed. I do not want my data on > >> OpenZFS. > >> > >> > >> But FreeBSD 12 is now EOL and unsupported. I cannot access the final > >> set of packages. > >This may be helpful > >https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tag/?h=12.4-eol > >as the ports tree is contained within the 74MB > >https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/snapshot/ports-12.4-eol.tar.gz Perhaps this is relevant. It seems the bug was also in FreeBSD 12: https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/04/two_new_versions_of_openzfs/ [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:02 PM Dewayne Geraghty <<a href="mailto:dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au">dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br> >> My avoidance of OpenZFS has been reaffirmed. I do not want my data on <br> >> OpenZFS.<br> >><br> >><br> >> But FreeBSD 12 is now EOL and unsupported. I cannot access the final <br> >> set of packages.<br>>This may be helpful<br>><a href="https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tag/?h=12.4-eol" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tag/?h=12.4-eol</a><br>>as the ports tree is contained within the 74MB<br> ><a href="https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/snapshot/ports-12.4-eol.tar.gz" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/snapshot/ports-12.4-eol.tar.gz</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Perhaps this is relevant. It seems the bug was also in FreeBSD 12:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/04/two_new_versions_of_openzfs/">https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/04/two_new_versions_of_openzfs/</a><br></div><div> </div></div></div>;help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAESeg0xkQuMPefcyRMw2QhxVz9WE8jveRvt-puvrcSm8qXAdKw>