Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:13:01 +0000
From:      "Aryeh Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To:        Astrodog <astrodog@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Backhaus <robbak@robbak.com>
Subject:   Re: small purposal for change in installworld
Message-ID:  <bef9a7920710030113q1e0f605cqd0c51b2114edce5d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2fd864e0710030030h1bbacc5enc6e1502cb2929dbf@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <bef9a7920710021757kc553836g8aae00ca139830f6@mail.gmail.com> <d4499580710030004m2fb57600ke9e4ac7159e95fb7@mail.gmail.com> <bef9a7920710030011m735a7b53y572510ac74bf1cb5@mail.gmail.com> <2fd864e0710030030h1bbacc5enc6e1502cb2929dbf@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Given the inherent dangers of using cvsup, and updating from source, I
> do not believe this... minor barrier to entry really deserves
> consideration, and I'm sure we can all agree that it really would be
> best to paint it blue.

Even though your quiet right from a techinical stand point I think
this is one of the attitudes that has kept FreeBSD from being
considered by linux people... namely your right on this specific point
but the attitude behind is likelly to be a turn off



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bef9a7920710030113q1e0f605cqd0c51b2114edce5d>