Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:51:01 GMT From: Vlad Skvortsov <vss@high.net.ru> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/82508: misleading man page for basename/dirname Message-ID: <200506220251.j5M2p1UX022891@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200506220300.j5M30eug043970@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
>Number: 82508
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: misleading man page for basename/dirname
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed Jun 22 03:00:39 GMT 2005
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Vlad Skvortsov
>Release: 5.2.1
>Organization:
Netli, Inc.
>Environment:
FreeBSD vlad.hq.netli.lan 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Sat May 22 11:32:00 PDT 2004 root@vlad.hq.netli.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VLAD i386
>Description:
The man pages for both basename(3) and dirname(3) state that the functions return pointers to the internal _static_ storage. However, those functions actually perform malloc() call to allocate storage on the first invocation. Thus, the memory pointer returned is actually a pointer to internal but dynamically allocated storage.
I don't know whether this violates standard or not, but the documentation is misleading.
>How-To-Repeat:
Not applicable.
>Fix:
Fix the docs.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506220251.j5M2p1UX022891>