Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:15:41 -0500
From:      "Nikolas Britton" <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>
To:        "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        scottl@freebsd.org, Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com>, erich@areca.com.tw, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Phillip Neumann <pneumann@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca
Message-ID:  <ef10de9a0703260515k51a2b0b6ye4e927d752954c09@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46069F1E.6090008@samsco.org>
References:  <ef10de9a0703241853t2a06f651r3286423d3b1b5feb@mail.gmail.com> <000b01c76e82$9e6f5a10$0502a8c0@IBMA618C20271E> <ef10de9a0703242306s6d1806a6l5856d5b757db36a@mail.gmail.com> <46069F1E.6090008@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/25/07, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote:
> Nikolas Britton wrote:
> > Yeah are hardware is nearly identical. I don't remember what I did to
> > my custom driver, I know I fixed some syntax errors and merged in
> > changes that were made on top of the 1.20.00.02 code base. I'm not
> > sure but I think most of those changes were thrown out with the import
> > of 1.20.00.13 and 14.
> >
> > Yes ..0.13 is the driver from 6.2-RELEASE-p2 and no I don't see any
> > g_vfs errors, I do see a crap load of httpd errors that someone needs
> > to investigate, lucky me. :-/   It's not likely I'd see them anyhow
> > because the business slows way down during this time of year:
>
> Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver
> sources:  http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/arcmsr.simq.diff.
>

Thanks Scott... Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on your
outlook, spring break ends today and I've got a crap load of studying
to do, so no time to play guinea pig...  But because I'm such a nice
guy I've compiled i386 and amd64 binaries so the others can play
along.  I compiled everything against 6.2-RELEASE-p2...

Download them here: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/fb62/

Do you have any testing scripts so the group can do repeatable
comparison tests using the old and new kernel modules? Thanks. Oh and
here's a file list but gmail is probably going to mutilate it:

arcmsr.c.1824:                     ASCII C program text
arcmsr.h.1142:                     ISO-8859 C program text
arcmsr.kld.fb62.i386.032607:       ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel
80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped
arcmsr.ko.debug.fb62.amd64.032607: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD
x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped
arcmsr.ko.fb62.amd64.032607:       ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD
x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped
arcmsr.ko.fb62.i386.032607:        ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel
80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped
arcmsr.o.fb62.amd64.032607:        ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD
x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped
arcmsr.o.fb62.i386.032607:         ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel
80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped
i386_build_log.txt:                ASCII text, with very long lines



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef10de9a0703260515k51a2b0b6ye4e927d752954c09>