Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:52:00 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r217871 - head/sbin/mount Message-ID: <4D54CE80.3060305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110128194615.G1167@besplex.bde.org> References: <201101260506.p0Q56Bhf064034@svn.freebsd.org> <20110126173411.P972@besplex.bde.org> <4D408463.4000001@FreeBSD.org> <20110127153956.J1436@besplex.bde.org> <4D41D52D.2080906@FreeBSD.org> <20110128194615.G1167@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/28/2011 01:06, Bruce Evans wrote: > The solaris server behaviour can't happen, except accidentally due to > races :-). Since the FreeBSD client doesn't support the noatime flag > except to ignore it, it can't tell any server about it. I don't mean to be a pest, but I'm confused as to why I observed what I observed if this is the case. I tested it a couple of times each way, so I'm confident that I saw a difference with and without noatime when mounting a solaris server. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D54CE80.3060305>