Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 10:19:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> To: Ask Bjoern Hansen <ask@valueclick.com> Cc: Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Benchmarking web apps on Apache Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907091019130.99565-100000@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907081631540.9761-100000@impatience.valueclick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Regardless, the performance data are not in our favor. SB On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > tOn Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seth wrote: > > ... > > mod_perl handler stuff). The "crucial" tests (dynamic content via cgi's) > > showed the other OS to edge out our beloved FreeBSD. > > Nah, get real. If you're concerned about performance, cgi will be your > last option. > > :-) > > - ask (doing almost all of his hits with apache/mod_perl on FreeBSD) > > -- > ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>; > more than 14M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>; > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907091019130.99565-100000>