Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:01:59 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: kmacy@freebsd.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, current@freebsd.org, Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base Message-ID: <20090921210159.2D4D51CC37@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:25:13 PDT." <82c4140e0909211225j5ab8ecf3q2645323bec99274d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:25:13 -0700 > From: "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org> > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > > Screen has almost always been the first thing I install on new > > machines, but recently I've been switching more and more machines > > over to tmux instead. Having it in base would be a great addition. > > > > The first thing *I* always install is xemacs and zsh... most(1) and xemacs(1), but this is getting seriously off topic. 1. Should such a tool be in the base system? 2. If so, should it be screen(1) or tmux(1) I vote 'no' to 1 and 'tmux(1)' for 2. I've just spent a fews minutes with tmux and it has several wins over screen. Then again, FreeBSD is not a democracy, so 'voting' is really just advisory. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090921210159.2D4D51CC37>