Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:55:37 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: removing libreadline from base system Message-ID: <20111202015537.GB4111@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <CADe0-4kDotyR096Yfv9_pwAw_K6fe2XJ5QUpgkFLE1Q6q4YdmA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADe0-4kDotyR096Yfv9_pwAw_K6fe2XJ5QUpgkFLE1Q6q4YdmA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit > after r228114. > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline: > 1) just build & link gdb with libedit > OR > 2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build INTERNALLIB version of > it that is never installed and is linked only to gdb Max, What is the value in doing either? libreadline isn't infecting any non-GPL code turning into GPLv2. Some of use have fancy .input files, and quite frankly the vi mode of libedit still doesn't work quite the same as libreadline. If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up with a libreadline on the system anyway. > I am inclined to go for 1) but libedit may have (and has) incompatibilities > with libreadline. I'm inclined to DO NOTHING. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111202015537.GB4111>