Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:09:17 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.org>, brian@Awfulhak.org, joshua@roughtrade.net, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, brian@freebsd-services.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist src/etc/namedb named.conf Message-ID: <200108292209.f7TM9Hn15403@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:03:43 %2B0300." <20010830000343.A5116@hades.hell.gr> References: <20010830000343.A5116@hades.hell.gr> <20010829091857E.jkh@freebsd.org> <79238.999103002@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010830000343.A5116@hades.hell.gr> Giorgos Keramidas writes: : I suggest changing the default to sandbox bind too, but *add* the : note to UPDATING. MFC'ing the new feature is definitely cool. Both : bugfixes and new cool features are nice to see in -STABLE. However, : even for those few that might have a problem with the MFC, an : UPDATING note should be enough. Not necessarily. : We don't want to have RELENG_4 lag behind too much, just because : somebody might not read UPDATING before updating a system. The : people who will probably have a problem (those running a caching : bind behind a dialup) will usually have enough brains to *not* skip : reading UPDATING. Trye, but we don't want to change APIs either. Maybe this one is benign, but UPDATING isn't a magic bullet for all unwise API changes. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108292209.f7TM9Hn15403>