Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:34:16 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/151923: [patch] java/openjdk6: free and native openjdk bootstrap Message-ID: <201011031934.17767.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim%2BxOQQ9ujHcF%2B-YTzX9_SXBkRXu_vQnNV_A7=-@mail.gmail.com> References: <201011032110.oA3LABd5097970@freefall.freebsd.org> <201011031751.47171.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTim%2BxOQQ9ujHcF%2B-YTzX9_SXBkRXu_vQnNV_A7=-@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 06:43 pm, David DEMELIER wrote: > I made this like pkgsrc does, pkg_add -r openjdk6 pulls some > dependencies, I agree with you pkg_add'ing the prebuilt package is > possible but some people don't like this. If you are building it, you will need the dependencies sooner or later anyway. I don't see your point. :-/ > If you run -current or -stable packages could be outdated too, here > using a bootstrap will build depends from ports and openjdk from > ports without any binaries and without any non-free binaries. What made you think that your bootstrap binaries won't be outdated? In fact, I cannot shake the feeling that it may rot even faster than prebuilt packages. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011031934.17767.jkim>