Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:51:05 +0400 (MSD)
From:      Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To:        Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt <kvs@binarysolutions.dk>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: i386 package building on an amd64 system
Message-ID:  <20070914134928.Y14000@woozle.rinet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <m11wd1oabk.fsf@coruscant.pil.dk>
References:  <20070914124630.D14000@woozle.rinet.ru> <m11wd1oabk.fsf@coruscant.pil.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt wrote:

KVS> > possibly stupid question: it there a way to fool jail (real, not "tinderbox" 
KVS> > one) that it's working under i386 kernel? This would be extremely useful for 
KVS> > local package building.
KVS> 
KVS> We do it by creating an i386 chroot on the amd64-machine. Works perfectly.

I'm a bit frightened by information which is exported by kernel (which is 
64bit) - or is this case treated specially? We can fool uname, but what about 
sysctls?

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:				     marck@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070914134928.Y14000>