Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:03:18 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@earthlink.net> To: G Brehm <gbbrehm@yahoo.com> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Best security topology for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20011126000318.B222@gohan.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <20011125013812.9839.qmail@web10106.mail.yahoo.com>; from gbbrehm@yahoo.com on Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 05:38:12PM -0800 References: <20011122031739.A226@gohan.cjclark.org> <20011125013812.9839.qmail@web10106.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 05:38:12PM -0800, G Brehm wrote: [snip] > I am confused by your bias. > You'd think if it was firewall OEM pushing one design > it would go for your preferered, (twice the $). There _is_ competition in the business. The market share gained by, "We can protect all of your networks with one machine!" is more important to firewall retailers than the possibility of selling multiple units to a single site. Most corporations underspend on information security. The one machine, many-interface firewall caters to this group. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011126000318.B222>