Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 11:12:25 -0700 From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: post ino64: lockd no runs? Message-ID: <20170611172022.GA3184@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <24b27f3e-f91b-553d-f2c1-e876608e0baf@protected-networks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:57:44AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> It seems that {rpc.}lockd no longer runs after the ino64 changes on any
> of my systems after a full rebuild of src and ports. No log entries
> offer any insight as to why :-(
>=20
> imb
I don't tend to use NFS on my systems that are running head, so I
haven't had occasion to test this as stated.
However, I just completed my weekly update of the "prooduction" systems
here at home, running stable/11. And I find that lockd seems to be ...
claiming that all is well, but declining to run (for long).
To the best of my knowledge, that was not the case until this last
update, which was from:
FreeBSD albert.catwhisker.org 11.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-PRERELEASE #316 =
r319566M/319569:1100514: Sun Jun 4 03:54:41 PDT 2017 root@freebeast.c=
atwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/ALBERT amd64
to
FreeBSD albert.catwhisker.org 11.1-BETA1 FreeBSD 11.1-BETA1 #322 r319823M/=
319823:1100514: Sun Jun 11 03:56:10 PDT 2017 root@freebeast.catwhisker.=
org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/ALBERT amd64
The "glaringly obvious" symptom in my case is that I am now unable
to (directly) save an email message from within mutt(1) by appending
it to an NFS-resident file. (Saving it to a local file, then using
cat(1) to append that to the NFS- resident file & removing the local
copy works....)
After a few variations on a theme of:
albert(11.1)[5] sudo service lockd restart
lockd not running?
Starting lockd.
albert(11.1)[6] echo $?
0
albert(11.1)[7] service lockd status
lockd is not running.
I finally(!) thought to ask ktrace what's going on (as tailing
/var/log/messages was completely unproductive, even after enabling
rc_debug).
So I tried: "sudo ktrace -di service lockd restart"; upon exanimation of
the output of kdump(1), I see that the trace ends with:
...
2811 rpc.lockd NAMI "/var/run/logpriv"
2786 sh CALL read(0xa,0x627fc0,0x400)
2786 sh GIO fd 10 read 0 bytes
""
2811 rpc.lockd RET connect 0
2786 sh RET read 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sendto(0x3,0x7fffffffe2c0,0x27,0,0,0)
2786 sh CALL exit(0)
2811 rpc.lockd GIO fd 3 wrote 39 bytes
"<30>Jun 11 15:43:10 rpc.lockd: Starting"
2811 rpc.lockd RET sendto 39/0x27
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigaction(SIGALRM,0x7fffffffec20,0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigaction 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL nlm_syscall(0,0x1e,0x4,0x801015040)
2811 rpc.lockd RET nlm_syscall -1 errno 14 Bad address
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x800830c78,0x7fffffffea40)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x800830c8c,0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x800830c78,0x7fffffffe5b0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x800830c8c,0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x800830c78,0x7fffffffe5b0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x800830c8c,0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x800830c78,0x7fffffffe5b0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x800830c8c,0)
2811 rpc.lockd RET sigprocmask 0
2811 rpc.lockd CALL exit(0x1)
Then, when I tried to send this message, I started getting more whines
=66rom mutt(1). I finall gave up and rebooted from the previous
environment:
FreeBSD albert.catwhisker.org 11.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-PRERELEASE #316 =
r319566M/319569:1100514: Sun Jun 4 03:54:41 PDT 2017 root@freebeast.c=
atwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/ALBERT amd64
and lockd is running:
albert(11.1-P)[2] service lockd status
lockd is running as pid 629.
albert(11.1-P)[3]=20
so mutt(1) is not pitchng a hisssy-fit every time I try to save or
send a message.
In light of the above, I have Bcced: this message to current@ (where
the thread originated) and sent it (and set replies) to stable@.
I have a test system, last updated to stable/11 as of mid-October
last year; lockd was running on it, as well (which is why I tried
going back to last week's image). I'm happy to update it to points
where lockd may be broken, if it might help figure out what's broken
and how to fix it.
Peace,
david
--=20
David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org
Looking forward to telling Mr. Trump: "You're fired!"
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=
=RNn/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170611172022.GA3184>